29 October 2014

Legal 500 Year 2015

The Legal 500 - The Clients Guide to Law Firms


This is another great team effort by Team RWY to ensure the firm's position in Legal 500's ranking. 


10 October 2014

RWY Sports Law Conference 2014




After the successful RWY Sports Law Conference of 2013; Richard Wee & Yip will again host the 2nd Instalment of the RWY Sports Law Conference. 


Location & Date :-

This year's Conference will be held on 4th December 2014, at the spanking new Kuala Lumpur Regional Centre of Arbitration's (KLRCA) Building at Bangunan Sulaiman at Kuala Lumpur. Slated to start at 9.30am, the 2014 chapter will be an all-day Conference, unlike the 2013 one which was only a half-day event. 


Speakers :-

The key-note speaker is Everton Football Club's Head of Legal Services, Chris Anderson. Issues related to financial fair play & transfer dealings would probably be discussed. Everton FC is a leading club in the English Premier League and their presence at RWY Sports Law Conference 2014 is hugely welcomed. 

Court of Appeal Judge, JCA Dato Mah Weng Kwai has also kindly agreed to speak in the session related to Dispute Resolution in Sports. His Lordship's outlook of this area of Law, from a Judicial point of view would be invaluable for the delegates the Conference.

From the Bar, a few Malaysian Lawyers will take the podium to present their thoughts. Isa Aziz Ibrahim, Foong Cheng Leong & Siti Sharom will be delivering their respective views on Dispute Resolution, Intellectual Property & Sports; and Tax Law & Sports. All 3 lawyers have experience in their respective areas and the delegates can expect to learn a thing or two from them. 

From Australia, Paul Hayes of 39 Essex has kindly agreed to fly over and join us at the Conference. He will join JCA Dato Mah and Isa Aziz Ibrahim as a panel speaker with regards to Dispute Resolution. Paul's Australian perspective of Sports Law will be interesting, especially since Australian Sports Law is very developed. 

Other than lawyers, the Conference also features Football Association of Malaysia's (FAM) Deputy Secretary General, Lazarus Xavier and TV Presenter (& current FOX Sports Anchorman) Ben Ibrahim. They will share their views about Sports Contract. Expect a debate on this topic as the discussion relates to finding the balance between the rights of Athletes and the commercial interests of Sports Associations and/or Sponsors.  


Sponsors :-

Lexis Nexis is the corporate sponsor, while Messrs Richard Wee & Yip remains the principle sponsor, organiser and host for this Conference.  


Contact Person:-

Do contact Lesley Lim at lesley@rwy.com.my for further information. 

08 October 2014

My internship experience at RWY - Vynny Wong


Before I finished my year one, I successfully applied to RWY to work as an attachment student during my summer break. Despite the fact that some of my friends told me that an internship was a waste of time, as the firm would not appreciate your existence and, as a law student who has yet to graduate, you would not learn much throughout the internship period, I had my doubts and did not believe what was told to me. I preferred to experience it myself.

In the 3 months of my internship, I learnt to work with other senior lawyers and attachment students as a team. This ensured that everyone knew what was happening and we could easily come out with a solution through discussion. A task to do some research on the Federal Constitution was given to me and other attachment students to work on as a team. To be honest, as a Malaysian, I had never read or even wanted to know what the content of our Federal Constitution actually was. Ironically, there is a chapter known as “British Constitution” in my constitutional law year one textbook. This presented me with very good opportunity to know more about my own country which I took up wholeheartedly.

Besides that, I was also given a chance to draft a Letter of Demand and a Statement of Claim as well as to do some transcribing work and help out in conveyancing matters as well. I discovered that a letter can reflect the professionalism of an associate through the line of words found in the letter. Therefore, one needs to be very detail-oriented and ensure that there are no mistakes before issuing out any letters. In conveyancing, I learnt the important of being precise and particular, as a tiny little error would affect the whole procedure.

By doing some preparation work on a file, I had grasped some idea as to where one should start their research work. This is something I was not thought in law school. I was also trained on how to prioritize my work and how to complete the task given within the time frame given. I was also given an opportunity to attend in court and was able to observe how lawyers handle their cases and were able to speak confidently in front of the Judges. It was a fruitful experience. I was also lucky enough to join in several meetings with clients  which provided me with a good opportunity to witness how the a lawyer ought to deal with a client’s problem as well as how to approach a client and gain their trust.


I would extend my thanks to the all the guidance I had received from all the lawyers, in particular Ms. Lesley, Mr. Luey, Ms. Sarah, Mr. Lim and Ms. Jyh Ling as well as my two bosses, Mr. Richard and Mr. Yip during my three months with RWY. I apologize for any trouble I may have caused and appreciate the patience provided to me. Many thanks as well to Kak Sal, Ms. Penny and Auntie Wee for their guidance in clerical work. The experience I gained through this internship is something that I will treasure and always remember in the future. In addition, my weight had increased throughout my internship period showing that all the good food provided to me at RWY motivated me to work harder. I would like to end my passage with the quote from one of the bosses, Mr. Yip, who impressed upon me that “practice in law is not a sprint, by a marathon”. Thanks to my internship, I will definitely maintain a spirit to succeed in the legal profession and will move forward with to become a lawyer with a deeper passion of the law.

By Wong Poh Yee, Vynny

09 September 2014

CIPAA 2012 - How does it work? - by Wong Jyh Ling



You may visit the link below for RWY's Powerpoint Slides on CIPAA 2012:-
http://www.slideshare.net/jyhling/rwy-cipaa-2012-scope-and-applicability


Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 (“CIPAA”)

Part I. An Introduction

I.               Introduction – What is CIPAA?
One of the biggest issues faced by contractors in the construction industry is the delay, if not non-payment by their employers in the construction project. In order to remedy their position in such a predicament, contractors were forced to resort to either civil litigation or arbitration to recover their monies. Unfortunately, the litigation/arbitration processes are usually tedious, slow, and involves professional fees that would poise as an obstacle for contractors who lack the requisite monetary funds.

Hence, on 15th April 2014, the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 (“CIPAA”), which was gazetted 22nd June 2012, finally came into operation to address and hopefully alleviate this problem. 

CIPAA introduces an intervening provisional stage in the dispute resolution process vide the concept of “pay first, argue later”. In a nutshell, CIPAA aims to ensure that all employers of contractors in the construction industry (including the Government) pay their contractors promptly so that the contractors are not starved for cash.  

The application of CIPAA effectively removes conditional payment provisions of “pay when paid” or “pay if paid” which contributes to cash flow problems. However, it is to be noted that CIPAA is only applicable to construction disputes which arises on/after 15th April 2014.

The governing rules and procedure of CIPAA include:-
a)   Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012;
b)   Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Regulations 2014;
c)   Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication (Exemption) Order 2014; and
d)   KLRCA Adjudication Rules and Procedure.



II.             Why CIPAA?
First of all, the adjudication proceedings under CIPAA are private in nature, which provides parties confidentiality in the contents of the dispute.
Secondly, many construction companies (the appointed contractors) are able to rely on this statutory solution to specifically deal with the following prevailing cash flow issues:-
a)   Defaults in payment;
b)   Conditional payments; and
c)   Non-payments.



III.           Comparison
No.

Litigation
Arbitration
Adjudication
1.     
Venue

Court
Anywhere
Anywhere
2.     
Parties
Plaintiff
&
Defendant

Applicant
&
Respondent
Claimant
&
Respondent
3.     
Representation
Lawyers
Lawyers/
Self-Representation

Lawyers/
Self-Representation
4.     
Decision-Maker
Judge
Arbitrator

Adjudicator
5.     
Effect of Solutions
Binding
(Judgment in Law)
Binding
(Arbitral Decision)

Temporarily Binding
(Pay first, argue later)
6.     
Costs

High
Medium
Lower
7.     
Time
Slower
Slower
Faster





IV.           Scope and Applicability

Under Section 2 of CIPAA, CIPAA is applicable to every construction contract made in writing relating to construction work which is carried out wholly or partly within the territory of Malaysia. It is worthy to note that the construction contracts also include contracts entered into by the Government of Malaysia. It is to be noted that CIPAA does not apply to construction contracts entered into by a natural person for any construction work in respect of any building which is less than four storeys high and which is wholly intended for his personal occupation.

V.             How Does It Work?

        TIMELINE OF ADJUDICATION PROCESS
     The timeline of the Adjudication Process is, briefly, as follows:-
1.    The Contractor/Unpaid Party will firstly serve a Payment Claim to the Employer/Non-Paying Party (Section 5 CIPAA).

2.    Thereafter, there are four possibilities:-
a)   If the Non-Paying Party fails to respond, the Payment Claim is deemed to be disputed wholly (Section 6(4) CIPAA);
b)   If the Non-Paying Party admits to the Payment Claim wholly, then both parties may proceed to arrange for settlement of claim;
c)   If the Non-Paying Party responds to the Payment Claim by disputing the claim wholly, then the Unpaid Party may initiate an Adjudication Proceeding (Section 7 CIPAA);
d)   If the Non-Paying Party admits to the Payment Claim in part, then the Unpaid Party may initiate an Adjudication Proceeding based on the disputed portion of the claim.

3.    The Unpaid Party/Claimant initiates the Adjudication Proceeding by serving a written notice of adjudication on the Non-Paying Party/Respondent (Section 8 CIPAA).

4.    An Adjudicator will then be appointed either by the Director of KLRCA or by agreement of parties within 10 working days after the Respondent receives the written notice (Section 21 CIPAA).

5.    Thereafter, the Adjudicator who accepts the appointment would propose his terms and fees to be agreed upon by both parties (Section 22(2) CIPAA).

6.    Once the appointment of the Adjudicator is finalised, the Claimant will serve his Adjudication Claim on the Respondent within 10 working days from the receipt of the acceptance of appointment by the Adjudicator (Section 9 CIPAA).

7.    The Respondent will be required to answer and serve his Adjudication Response within 10 working days from the receipt of the Adjudication Claim (Section 10 CIPAA).

8.    If the Claimant wishes to respond further, then his Adjudication Reply must be served within 5 working days from the receipt of the Adjudication Response (Section 11 CIPAA).


9.    The Adjudicator then has 45 working days from the service of Adjudication Response or the Adjudication Reply, whichever later, to arrive at his decision (Section 12 CIPAA).



VI.           Conclusion

The introduction of CIPAA is an important stepping stone in the construction industry to alleviate and hopefully prevent the issue of cash flow shortage by construction contractors. While CIPAA may not be able to guarantee a permanent solution, it is a quick and handy tool for contractors to obtain regular and timely payment. 

By Wong Jyh Ling