17 January 2011
13 January 2011
This is the 3rd part of this series (click here for Part 1, and here for Part 2). RWY continue to do a comparison study on how other countries approach the rights of a person (not arrested) called to help the Police or relevant authorities.
We look at Australia this time around:-
In Australia, in particular at New South Wales [“NSW”], a similar code to the Code of
Practice C of the PACE 1984 was enacted to improve the accountability of the NSW Police service to the community it serves.
The Code of Practice for CRIME (Custody, Rights, Investigation, Management and Evidence), entails such practice.
At page 44 of the Code, it is the duty of the police to treat people who are voluntarily at a police station to help with an investigation with no less consideration than those in custody.
Person voluntarily assisting should be offered refreshments at appropriate times, entitled to obtain legal advice, communicate with anyone outside the station or leave at any time.
A fourth (& final) part of this series of discussion will be posted soon.
10 January 2011
We refer to the United States Constitution [“USC”]. In the Fifth and Sixth Amendment of the USC, in criminal proceedings, the accused is given the right for assistance of counsel:-
It is hoped Malaysian Laws will adopt a similar approach.
07 January 2011
06 January 2011
*RWY is solicitors on record, holding a watching brief at the said Inquest for and on behalf of the Malaysian Bar